Talocalcaneal Tarsal Coalition Size: Evaluation and Reproducibility of MRI Measurements.

BACKGROUND: The size of talocalcaneal tarsal coalitions (TCCs) is one of the main factors that is thought to influence patient outcomes after resection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used to diagnose and characterize TCCs. However, there is no reproducible MRI-based measurement of TCC size reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to create a method to reproducibly measure TCC size using MRI. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with TCCs diagnosed by a hindfoot coronal proton density (PD) MRI between 2017 and 2020 were included. Five independent raters measured coalition width, healthy posterior facet width, and healthy middle facet width on individual slices of coronal PD hindfoot MRIs using discrete MRI measurement guidelines. Individual slice measurements were summed to determine total size of the coalition and the remaining healthy cartilage of the posterior and middle facets. Inter-rater reliability of MRI measurements between the 5 independent examiners was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC was calculated for total coalition width, total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy middle facet width, total coalition width/total healthy subtalar facet width (posterior facet+middle facet), and total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (coalition+posterior facet+middle facet). RESULTS: The ICC scores for all but one of the MRI measurements indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability among the 5 examiners. The ICC was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.966) for measurement of total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width and 0.948 (95% confidence interval: 0.908-0.973) for measurement of total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (middle+posterior+coalition). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of coalition size using novel MRI guidelines were reproducible with good to excellent inter-rater reliability. These guidelines allow for determination of TCC size using coronal PD MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic reproducibility study.

Sustentaculum Tali Fracture Adjacent to Talocalcaneal Tarsal Coalitions: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: An 11-year-old boy demonstrated chronic medial hindfoot pain. A 12-year-old boy experienced acute pain and swelling in his right medial ankle and hindfoot after a fall. This is the first report of sustentaculum tali fractures adjacent to a talocalcaneal tarsal coalition, likely resulting from a stress riser created by a rigid subtalar joint. CONCLUSION: These 2 cases represent unique causes of foot pain in the setting of tarsal coalitions, never before described. Patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated expected improved outcomes after excision of tarsal coalition. Awareness to this possibility will help clinicians treating foot and ankle conditions in children optimize their care.

Intermediate-Term Outcomes Following Operative and Nonoperative Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Children and Adolescents: Internal Fixation May Improve Outcomes.

Although multiple prospective comparative studies exist for adults with midshaft clavicle fractures, few comparative studies exist in older children and adolescents. This study compares intermediate-term functional, pain, radiographic, and complication outcomes in children and adolescents with midshaft clavicle fractures treated operatively or nonoperatively. METHODS: Children and adolescents who were 10 to 18 years of age with midshaft clavicle fractures treated from 2006 to 2017 were identified through electronic picture archiving and communication system (PACS) radiographic and chart review. Closed injuries with a minimum of 1 year from the time of the injury were included. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measures and a focused questionnaire. The primary outcome was the abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) score; the secondary outcomes included the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and PROMIS Physical Function (PF) Upper Extremity (UE), Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain, and rates of implant removal, nonunion, and refracture. Univariate comparisons between the operatively treated group and the nonoperatively treated group were performed. RESULTS: In this study, 302 patients were identified; of these, 79 patients (43 operatively treated and 36 nonoperatively treated) or their parent or legal guardian consented and the patients completed the study protocol. The mean age (and standard deviation) at the time of the injury was 16.0 ± 1.7 years for the operatively treated group and 13.5 ± 1.8 years for the nonoperatively treated group (p < 0.001). The median follow-up was 3.8 years. The patient-reported outcome scores were similar (p > 0.05 for all comparisons) between the operatively treated group and the nonoperatively treated group, even for patients at or near skeletal maturity and those with shortening of ≥15 mm or ≥100% translation. There were no nonunions. The refracture rate was 5% (2 of 43) for the operatively treated group and 3% (1 of 36) for the nonoperatively treated group (p = 1.00). There were 19% (8 of 43) who underwent implant removal. Responders were similar to nonresponders, other than female patients (p < 0.001) and surgically treated patients (p = 0.049) being more likely to respond. CONCLUSIONS: In the subset of this cohort who responded and completed the study, both operatively and nonoperatively treated patients had excellent functional and pain outcomes, similar refracture rates, and no nonunions. Even in widely displaced and translated fractures, and in those at or near skeletal maturity, outcomes were similar. Operative management should potentially be reserved for special circumstances. A prospective comparative study of older adolescents (female patients who are 14 to 18 years of age and male patients who are 16 to 20 years of age) with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pediatric orthopedic mythbusters: the truth about flexible flatfeet, tibial and femoral torsion, W-sitting, and idiopathic toe-walking.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myths, widely held but false or unproven beliefs, exist in pediatric orthopedics, with the most common examples related to flexible flatfeet, in-toeing/out-toeing, W-sitting, and toe-walking. Concerns regarding these findings and suggested treatments, unfounded in science, may be passed along verbally or published through various media, without citation. The current review investigates these myths and provides up to date recommendations on diagnosis and treatment (or lack of necessary treatment) for these common pediatric orthopedic findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Orthotics used in childhood do not alter foot development for flexible flatfeet. W-sitting is not associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip, and there is no scientific evidence to support that it leads to contractures, hip dislocations, or functional deficits. SUMMARY: Misinformation about normal variants of growth in childhood and suggested treatments are rampant and can be found published through various media without citation, as supportive scientific studies do not exist or existing studies refute the claims. Flexible flatfeet, in-toeing/out-toeing, W-sitting, and toe-walking typically improve throughout childhood without intervention. Physical therapy, orthotics and bracing have not been proven effective. Treatment is required in rare scenarios and should be directed by the orthopedic surgeon.